Search results for query: Eusebian

788 - Minuscule 788 - GA 788 - CSNTM https://manuscripts.csntm.org/manuscript/View/GA_788 Ms. from Porta Panagia to Athens (deviations agree in Matthew, John and Luke) Panagia mentioned with Benedict, on an island northeast of Athos. Special mention by Jongkind below - thus it could be exemplar...

wip

Dirk Jongkind The hand which inserted the Eusebian apparatus is not assignable to any of the scriptorium hands and is therefore labelled by Lake as scribe E. Kirsopp Lake = 1911 https://web.archive.org/web/20160702133758/http://textualcriticism.scienceontheweb.net/AG/Lake-on-Aleph1.html...

many references but nothing Ammonian in Jongkind Do the Eusebian sections totally co-opt and expand the Ammonian, with the same numbers? Catholic Encyclopedia https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Ammonian_Sections

...Hands (2014) William Andrew Smith https://books.google.com/books?id=pWHPBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA144 Two years after completing my analysis of the Eusebian Apparatus I chanced upon McFall’s unpublished 2007 research 81 and have updated the analysis below to interact with his (very similar) findings...

Was this from Tischendorf ? What did he write from 1859-1862 ? The Journal of Sacred Literature (1861) Alexaander Roberts (1826-1901) https://books.google.com/books?id=hbURAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA186

https://tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_canon_tables_01.htm Eusebius of Caesarea, The Gospel Canon Tables

...letter of Eusebius to Carpianus. Robert Waltzman https://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/Divisions.html#Eus The Ammonian Sections and Eusebian Canon Tables The Euthalian Apparatus Andreas's Divisions Michaelis (1823) https://books.google.com/books?id=eTA-AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA714 Granville...

The Eusebian Canons: An Early Catholic Approach to Gospel Harmony (1994) Edward Andrew Engelbrecht https://scholar.csl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=stm

Dirk Jongkind in Scribal Habits … gave us incredible and meticulous detail on the Eusebian canons He showed conclusively that by the time of Sinaiticus the Eusebian canons had undergone 1) corruption 2) conflation 3) transmission history Yo be continued

...the conflation theory. Conflation theory is here. https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/campianus-m-021-used-for-sinaiticus-eusebian-section-burgon.2901/#post-12600 Dirk Jongkind in email "As to the canons in Sinaiticus, they do push the timing away from early 4th century, as I...

...Eusebius proves to have been most familiar, is made impossible by the discovery that it is without S. Mark xv. 28, which constitutes the Eusebian Section numbered “216” in S. Mark’s Gospel. [Quite in vain has Tischendorf perversely laboured to throw doubt on this circumstance. It remains...

Novum Testamentum Græce, antiquissimorum codicum textus in ordine parallelo dispositi. Accedit collatio codicis Sinaitici. Ed. E.H. Hansell, Volume 3 (1864) Edward Halifax Hansell https://books.google.com/books?id=tJ4NAAAAQAAJ&pg=PR24

...The original ms. is written in the earliest uncial characters, without accents, points, or initial letters, and has neither the Eusebian canons, nor the Ammonian sections. The inscriptions and subscriptions of the different books are more concise than those in any other ms. now extant. In...

...However this may be: Ammonius of Alexander https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonius_of_Alexandria_(Christian) The Ammonian Sections and Eusebian Canon Tables https://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/Divisions.html#Eus in Matthew there are 355 sections but only 68 kefalaia. Michaelis...

This is from the Skeat & Milne book p. 37-38. Punctuation at the beginning of Matthew is shown to be from the original scribe A. Keep in mind that nobody has actually contested this analysis of Skeat, so all sorts of unusual elements exist in the supposed 4th century Matthew, in the early...