an 1861 argument that the Eusebian canons in Sinaiticus were not prima manu, thus it could be pre-Eusebius - was this from Tischendorf?

Steven Avery

Administrator
Was this from Tischendorf ?
What did he write from 1859-1862 ?

The Journal of Sacred Literature (1861)
Alexaander Roberts (1826-1901)
https://books.google.com/books?id=hbURAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA186

1695687135350.png
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Eclectic Magazine (1863)
https://books.google.com/books?id=AxNLAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA486
1695693275336.png


https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...ebian-and-ammonian-sections-in-original.2825/
textual writer Arthur Charles Barrett in 1867 says antiquity due to lack of Eusebian and Ammonian sections in original

Hansell - The Ammonian sections and Eusebian canons are not given in Tischendorf's printed editions
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...-given-in-tischendorfs-printed-editions.2833/

do the Sinaiticus Ammonian sections come from the Alexandrinus printed edition ?
https://purebibleforum.com/index.ph...me-from-the-alexandrinus-printed-edition.907/
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Full Collation (1864)
Scrivener
https://books.google.com/books?id=4pYEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA6

Nor will the conclusions to which we are thus led on, step by step, be at all weakened by the fact that Cod. Sinaiticus, in this particular disagreeing with Cod. Vaticanus, exhibits the Ammonian sections and Eusebian canons in red ink in the margin (see Facsimile 2, and p. xiv, note 1), of which Cod. Alexandrinus had hitherto supplied the earliest example. These numerals are very possibly by the hand of the original scribe, but must have been added by a contemporary, perhaps by the (Grk) or corrector (see p. xx), since to the eye they look quite as old, and here and there the arrangements of the manuscript in respect to breaks and initial letters (see p. xv) are plainly adapted to them 4. ... (continues) p. xxxvi

the presence, on the other hand, of the Ammonian sections and Eusebian canons in the Gospels and of the Vatican chapters in the Acts :—the unusual order of the books of the N. T., p. lxi
1695691164195.png

1695691223885.png
 
Top