Codex Bezae and Latin readings

[Steven Avery]

USE the new site that shows the texts in Gospels
John
https://greeknewtestament.net/gospel-of-john

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Bezae

David C. Parker - various spots
https://books.google.com/books?id=qmy92ZolKikC&pg=PA21

Tischendorf notes similarity in Gospel of John to Sinaiticus
See a comment from Simonides that there are not Latin mss. on Mt. Athos. Likely wrong, an overstatement.

EKTHESIS Has a Couple of Nerdy Posts About Bezae and Sinaiticus
https://web.archive.org/web/2020080...le-of-nerdy-posts-about-bezae-and-sinaiticus/

Epp - maybe somewhere on John, or Fee
https://books.google.com/books?id=eJMDCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA37

Michael Leary

https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-leary-45656143

 

[Steven Avery]

fcstly in error ? * What made Benedict so enamoured of the
Codex Bezae, as to adopt some of its readings where it stands
alone ? What made Benedict adopt into hie recension of the
New Testament readings which exist in no Greek MS. at
present known, and which are only found, as it were, in fossil,
petrified in some version, or in the writings of a Latin Father ?
Would any editor adopt, into the text of the New Testament, a
reading existing only in Latin, on the authority of only one
writer ? He might, indeed, believe the reading to be the true
one; but surely, on so slender a basis, he would hardly venture
to adopt it into his text. Would a Greek editor be likely to adopt
a reading on the sole authority of a Latin Version or a Latin
Father? Yet this is what, according to Dr. Simonides, his

uncle Benedict has done. ....

These are questions which must be answered satisfactorily before we can believe in this Benedictine Edition of the Septuagint and New Testament. We therefore wait for those further proofs which Dr. Simonides for the present reserves.

 

[Steven Avery]

western nature of the Gospel of John 1:1 - 8:38

Royse https://books.google.com/books?id=oWyej_jGSGYC&pg=PA401 John (actually 1:1-8:38) has been established by Fee, “Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John NTS 15 (1968-1969) 22-44 = Epp and Fee, Studies, 221-243. Gordon Fee Cronin, H.S. “An Examination of some Omissions of the Codex...

www.purebibleforum.com

Tischendorf references to Claromontanus Euthalian sections and Cantabrigiensis Gospel of John in context of Sinaiticus

Tischendorf references to Claromontanus and Cantabrigiensis https://books.google.com/books?id=j1VWIpyHX40C&pg=RA1-PP4 Ut miro saepe niodo cum Vaticano consentit, ita saepe illo invito, accedenlibus plerumque nobilissimis aliis testibus (per Johannis evangelium inprimis D codice...

www.purebibleforum.com

Encountering New Testament Manuscripts

This is a print on demand book and is therefore non- returnable. The field of textual criticism remains an exciting one. Thousands of manuscripts have been recovered in recent years. Using the methods of textual criticism, translators have been able to discern from these manuscripts a probably...

books.google.com

Scribal Habits in Early Greek New Testament Papyri

In textual criticism, the 'scribal habits' in a manuscript (tendencies to make various sorts of changes) must be known in order to evaluate its testimony. Colwell analyzed the scribal habits in P45, P66, and P75, by examining their singular readings. This book expands on Colwell's work by...

books.google.com