Steven Avery
Administrator
Tischendorf references to Claromontanus and Cantabrigiensis
https://books.google.com/books?id=j1VWIpyHX40C&pg=RA1-PP4
Ut miro saepe niodo cum Vaticano consentit, ita saepe illo invito, accedenlibus plerumque nobilissimis aliis testibus (per Johannis evangelium inprimis D codice Cantabrigiensi) rectum videtur tenere vel cerie ex antiquissimis patribus alque interpretibus auctoritatem adsumit 2.
Unde quem testium criticorum omnium principatum tenere meretur, eum nec
As he surprisingly often agrees with the Vatican, so often in spite of it, he seems to hold to the right, or cerie from the most ancient fathers and interpreters, to other witnesses who are generally accessible to the most noble witnesses (through the Gospel of John, first of all the D codex of Cantabrigiens).
======================
Denique adscribere placet quae de versuum (Greek) quos vocant notatione — quae cui debelur „ is aetate vix diflert a codicis scriptoribus sed in quadam cum iis negotii socictate fuisse (suisse) credendus est“ — in Nov. Test. Sinait. pag. XXI. adnotata sunt: Horum versuum computationem minime ab Euthalio pendere in promptu est 3.
Finally, I would like to add what they call the notation of (Greek) verses - to whom it is owed "he was hardly different in age from the writers of the codex but it is believed that he was (was) in a certain business association with them" - in Nov. test. He signs page XXI They are recorded: The calculation of these verses depends at least on Euthalius.
3) Hoc etiam inde luculenter apparet, quod versus in quos codex epistularum Paulinarum Claromontanus ad Euthalii modum divisus est cum numeris computationis Sinaiticae, ut de aliis taceam, minime conveniunt.
3) This also clearly appears from the fact that the verses into which the codex of the Pauline epistles Claromontanus is divided in the manner of Euthalius with the numbers of the Sinaitic calculation, to say nothing of others, do not at all agree.
https://books.google.com/books?id=j1VWIpyHX40C&pg=RA1-PP4
Ut miro saepe niodo cum Vaticano consentit, ita saepe illo invito, accedenlibus plerumque nobilissimis aliis testibus (per Johannis evangelium inprimis D codice Cantabrigiensi) rectum videtur tenere vel cerie ex antiquissimis patribus alque interpretibus auctoritatem adsumit 2.
Unde quem testium criticorum omnium principatum tenere meretur, eum nec
As he surprisingly often agrees with the Vatican, so often in spite of it, he seems to hold to the right, or cerie from the most ancient fathers and interpreters, to other witnesses who are generally accessible to the most noble witnesses (through the Gospel of John, first of all the D codex of Cantabrigiens).
======================
Denique adscribere placet quae de versuum (Greek) quos vocant notatione — quae cui debelur „ is aetate vix diflert a codicis scriptoribus sed in quadam cum iis negotii socictate fuisse (suisse) credendus est“ — in Nov. Test. Sinait. pag. XXI. adnotata sunt: Horum versuum computationem minime ab Euthalio pendere in promptu est 3.
Finally, I would like to add what they call the notation of (Greek) verses - to whom it is owed "he was hardly different in age from the writers of the codex but it is believed that he was (was) in a certain business association with them" - in Nov. test. He signs page XXI They are recorded: The calculation of these verses depends at least on Euthalius.
3) Hoc etiam inde luculenter apparet, quod versus in quos codex epistularum Paulinarum Claromontanus ad Euthalii modum divisus est cum numeris computationis Sinaiticae, ut de aliis taceam, minime conveniunt.
3) This also clearly appears from the fact that the verses into which the codex of the Pauline epistles Claromontanus is divided in the manner of Euthalius with the numbers of the Sinaitic calculation, to say nothing of others, do not at all agree.
Last edited: