https://forums.carm.org/threads/cod...catalogue-s-plural.14121/page-22#post-1233459
Your problem is to account for the existence of the Vetus Latina independently of a Long Greek recension: as to which, the existence of Sinaiticus is irrelevant.
The problem with the long Greek recension manuscripts that were a source for the Vetus Latina is that they don’t exist. Such theoretical manuscripts do not have a lot of pizazz!
Apparently, Antoine Augustin Calmet (1672-1757) theorized such a source and that was noted by Pierre Sabatier (1682-1742), p. 706 in his preface to Tobit in his
Bibliorum Sacronum in his Vetus Latina edition, which goes up to p.743. It would be interesting to find the Calmet waiting, which is in French and Latin. His writing will have a “clean room” element, not polluted by the Sinaiticus hodge-pudge.
Other early scholarship, like Richard Simon (1638-1712) contra Isaac Vossius (1618-1689), is focused more on the Jerome question, is Jerome’s Vulgate account trustworthy? Which still arises today! Johann Albert Fabricius (1668–1736) is noted as a source by Swete. Also Swete references Wilhelm Martin Leberecht de Wette (1780-1849), and he is before the Sinaiticus scholarship pollution and confusion, caused by the faux date.
As explained above, Sinaiticus fails as the proposed answer to the missing link. And it becomes a square peg in a round hole. Sinaiticus fits better as a result, rather than a cause, of influences that can include Latin and Hebrew and Syriac. Ironically, this was first noted by a fella named Constantine Tischendorf. He was hoping it would be a deal-breaker for the Athos production position. (He may have had inside knowledge on the production, as in his quote about mountains of Athos manuscripts.) However, the more we study Benedict, Athos and Sinaiticus, the more we see the linguistic and textual versatility and skill required. Note: Stuart Weeks properly raised some of these issues in our conversation, he gets a nod of appreciation.
So, it has been fun learning about the Tobit sources. It can be an ongoing inquiry. Some of your quotes have been very helpful, either for direct use or as a springboard.