the Hortian theory of conflations indicating a later text is false for most all Byz conflations, but true for Sinaiticus conflations

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
There was one that is truly a Byzantine conflation, Acts 20:28.

Most were easily refuted by Burgon and Pickering, because the supposed conflation was the original text, with two variants created by text drops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top