Frederick Nolan and Thomas Falconer tussle on Eusebius - was the Marcellum reference noted?

Steven Avery

Administrator
British Review (1814)
http://books.google.com/books?id=iLQEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA186
http://books.google.com/books?id=iLQEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA427

Remarks on a Passage in Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History : with translations in modern Greek and Italian. Communicated by M. Calbo to the Rev. F. Nolan. [Edited, with two letters to A.I. Kalbos and a postscript, by F. Nolan] (1818)
http://www.worldcat.org/title/remar...bos-and-a-postscript-by-f-nolan/oclc/79733026

A reply to the “End of Religious Controversy (1821)
Richard Grier
https://books.google.com/books?id=HGBjAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA47
Excellent summary - includes Marcellum - both sides

The case of Eusebius of Cæsarea ... who is said by mr. Nolan [in An inquiry into the integrity of the Greek Vulgate] to have mutilated fifty copies of the Scriptures sent to Constantine the great; examined (1818)
Thomas Falconer
http://books.google.com/books?id=lZ4HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1

The absurd hypothesis, that Eusebius of Cæsarea ... was an editor or corrupter of the holy Scriptures, exposed, [in reply to Remarks on a passage in Eusebius's Ecclesiastical history, by F. Nolan] in a second part of The case of Eusebius, by the author of the first; with an appendix on the eighth of the author's Bampton lectures, REPLY TO OBSERVATIONS Contained in a Book entitled Palaeoromaica. (1823)
Thomas Falconer
http://books.google.com/books?id=qDBcAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1

A PENNY POSTSCRIPT, exhibiting the competence and honesty displayed by Dr. Falconer, in a recent Tract, entitled " The absurd Hypothesis, that Eusebius of Caasarca, Bishop and Historian, was an Editor or Corrupter of the Holy Scripture exposed."
http://books.google.com/books?id=nlwVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA211

Supplement to An inquiry into the integrity of the Greek vulgate, or received text of the New Testament (1830)
Remarks on a Passage in Eusebius
Frederick Nolan
http://books.google.com/books?id=Xwg4sZ80GmcC&pg=PA1
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Eclectic Review (1818)
https://books.google.com/books?id=iLQ2AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA564
Review of Thomas Falconer book

Monthly Repository (1822)
https://books.google.com/books?id=vEMFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA40
Burgess construction solecistic solecism grammar - Nolan Eusebius theory - John Pye Smith "the masculine is used because the words are personified" p. 545

Eclectic Review (1823)
A Second part of the case of Eusebius
http://books.google.com/books?id=gOAEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA362

Quarterly Christian spectator (1824)
http://books.google.com/books?id=TPkbAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA628
On Nolan and Eusebius
J. P. W. - Lay Presbyters No. X p. 624-629

Christian Advocate (1825)
Brownlee
http://books.google.com/books?id=_tk2AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA65
see Nolan on ( Chrysostom Nectarius Bengel ) Epiphanius and Cyril on this point p. 545 and p. 93 - Eusebius .. dropt it from his 50 codices . (nov 1824 Christian Advocate)

Quarterly Review
http://books.google.com/books?id=dVqwFG_y_4kC&pg=PA70
Burgess leaves Nolan Eusebius theory (disciplina arcani too)

Monthly Review (1828)
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZKPQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA51
Socrates by William Cave re Eusebius used by Nolan

Samuel Lee (1829)
https://archive.org/details/novumtestamentum00unse_0/page/66/mode/2up/
Novum Testamentum polyglottum - Bagster - Eusebius Bill Brown Frederick Nolan

Eclectic Review (1830)
Greer
"Epitome of the General Councils" from Nolan on Nicea - Eusebius serves Arians expunges

Linkman Nolan Eusebius continues
1631109927019.png


1631109965322.png
 
Last edited:
Top