Clerical Journal - April, 1863 - and other editions - unwilling to seek the Simonides witnesses

Steven Avery

Administrator
1720736422809.png



https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...voided-at-the-end-of-a-line”.4405/#post-18312

==========================================

1865
http://books.google.com/books?id=PrkRAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA191

1862
http://books.google.com/books?id=n4AtAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA250

Check PBF
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
p. 253

“Simonides says he marked certain initials in the margins of his MS. He
also mentions the names of a number of persons who may confirm his statements,
and who are still living. Let those who will try to consult these persons,
including the coffee-house keeper at Galatas: we do not think it necessary.
The story wc have heard condemns itself as one of the wildest tissues of incon-
sistency which we have been called to notice formany a day. If the statements
are true, the production of the work was a modern miracle. Twenty short
months never saw so much accomplished by one individual since the art of
writing was invented. Wo simply do not bolicvo the accuracy for the narra-
tive, and repeat our conviction that the writer suffers from some unusual
hallucination.

“ The names he gives us arc not worth anything, until impartial and inde-
pendent persons can shew that they are realities and represent true witnesses.
Dr. Simonides must bo aware that with the overwhelming internal evidence of
the MS., it is not likely that his names will be hunted up. We conclude, there-
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
15 times in Elliott book

The Clerical Journal, October 1862, makes a similar point and also draws attention to the style of writing:

We cannot turn from this topic without a word for the encouragement
of those who are not skilled in old Biblical manuscripts. They might say, if
the Codex Sinaiticus is by any possibility a modern production, the same
may be true of other manuscripts which pass for the most ancient. Our
friends may be reassured: there are features in these most venerable copies
of the Holy Scriptures which cannot be imitated. A skilful man, by long
practice, and with a certain knowledge of chemistry, could imitate the
characters and appearance of many manuscripts on paper, and of some on
vellum. But there is a limit to these things, and detection is almost
inevitable. The action of ink upon vellum is peculiar, slow, and gradual,
and leads to results which can be measured by time
. The action of light and
air, and warmth, and moisture, are also remarkably uniform. The style of
writing peculiar to certain periods is commonly definable. The arrangement
of all the parts of a manuscript is also, when taken in connexion with other
phenomena, a clue of great value. Indeed, palaeography and textual
criticism together, enable men not only to fix often the country, and more
often the date of a manuscript, but even the class and age of that from
 
Last edited:
Top