Uranios notes from Enthüllungen (Expose, Disclosure) by Lycourgas

Steven Avery

Administrator
p. 81- footnote
1. Das ist Folgendes: „Die Form des a bezeichnen Sie gerade als die richtige ägyptisch - griechische. Dagegen muss ich bemerken, dass sie sich wohl der koptisch-griechischen, wie eben das v auch, einigermassen nähert, aber eben so sehr auch davon unterscheidet. Die koptisch-griechische Form des « ist stets unten nach der rechten Seite geschweift, wie sie am schönsten in den alten Borgianischen Fragmenten des Joh. Ev. steht (obschon das Georgi'sche Facsimile höchst mangelhaft ist). Diese Ausschweifung fehlte ganz an den von mir gesehenen Formen bei Simonides, und ebenso weicht seine Form von der echten dadurch ab, dass der Bauch gewöhnlich viel zu gross ist und zu hoch steht."
1690516284291.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
From Genius
p. 6
p. 133
p. 189
p. 208
p. 210 PIC ***
=====
p. 217-232
p. 227 COLOR PIC
p. 232 - Bibliography
=====
1690517332506.png


1690517797713.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
p. 234-246
MANY PICS
Especially p. 238

Seems like Uranios is called the underwriting
=======================================
1690517927525.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Tischendorf in 1856
https://books.google.com/books?id=5_cCAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA149
Orthodoxōn Hellēnōn theologikai graphai tessares. aʹ. Nikolaou episkopou Methōnēs logos pros tous Latinous peri tou hagiou Pneumatos hoti ek tou Patros ou mēn kai ek tou Huiou ekporeuetai [&c.]. Ta panta hupo K. Simōnidou ekdidomena

1690547381978.png

1 44 Und die Aufgabe heisst nun: Wie kann die Anerkennung der Meisterschaft der Simonidischer Schrift mir selbst zur Folio der Paläographischen Kennerschaft dienen, indem ich das vermeintlich Meisterschafte fiir stümpferhaft erkläre ? Ware ich so glücklich gewesen diese Aufgabe zu lösen, so wäre ich um so viel Stunden reichten sie wenigstens mit freundlicher Nachsicht gelesen werden.
44 Den 26 März. 1856. 44 C. Tischendorf.”

And the task is now: How can the recognition of the mastery of the Simonidean script serve me as a folio of paleographic knowledge by declaring the supposed mastery to be shoddy? If I had been fortunate enough to solve this problem, I would have lasted so many hours to read it with kind indulgence.
 

Steven Avery

Administrator


Simonides giving that Hermas palimpsest page Graecus 119 to the Austrian Library gets mentioned in various places. This fragment was studied in the Genius book using scientific tools, apparently they wanted to know if the overtext is authentic, which is a bit puzzling.

Christian Gasteber p. 207 in the Genius book also has a discussion.

Biographical Memoir of 1859 on p. 43-44 and p. 85 is another.

========================

In the Biographical Memoir Uranios is discussed in various spots, on p. 44 Simonides says he is keeping it, maybe it could end up in a Greek library .
Afaik so far, it got lost in the shuffle and nothing is extant of the actual manuscript.

========================

"After that, the Uranius palimpsest disappeared.46"
46 A few years later, on April 24, 1869, the journal Notes and Queries published a note on Simonides by Samuel Prideaux Tregelles that ended with the question: ‘On behalf of Prof. W. Dindorf, of Leipsic, I have also to ask: Whether the parchment MS. of the so-called “Uranius of Simonides” is preserved in the collection of Mr. Mayer at Liverpool or elsewhere? I shall be glad to communicate to him the answer that I may receive’,
cf. Tregelles 1869.

Tregelles, Samuel Prideaux (1869), “Codex Mayerianus and Simonides”, in: Notes and Queries, 4th S., III, April 24, 389.

Genius
Simonides in England, A Forger's Paradise p. 122
Pasquale Massimo Pinto

========================

For Tischendorf, this might help determine what position he took publicly when:


1690680743306.png


========================
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Uranios

Egyptology: Lepsius at the Second International Congress of Orientalists (1874)
Harco Willems
https://journals.openedition.org/bifao/14767

Lepsius ridiculed

The atmosphere between Lepsius and de Rougé did not improve. In late 1855, a parchment inscribed with a Greek text was offered to the Academy of Sciences in Berlin by the antiquities dealer Constantine Simonides. In the document, a certain Uranios presents an encompassing and unique account of Egyptian history. The manuscript was rather expensive, and when the Berlin Academy of Sciences could not rapidly furnish the sum required, Lepsius provided half the amount from his own pocket. However, the Uranios text was a fake, and when this became known it led to great public exhilaration. According to the diary of Elisabeth, Lepsius’s wife, a comedy play about the scandal was even staged in the Königsstädtisches Theater in Berlin, in which one of the protagonists was called Lipsius. International scholarship wrote scathingly about Lepsius. This was for instance the case in France. Lepsius’s protests, adressed in 1856 to Emmanuel de Rougé, met with a cold shoulder: the irritations about the way Brugsch had been treated, clearly had not yet subsided.83

83 Mehlitz 2011, pp. 262–265. The comedy was written by Ernst Dohm and entitled “Simonides oder die Wissenschaft muß umkehren.” Since the Königsstädtisches Theater had been closed in 1851, Elisabeth’s remark that the play was enacted there must be incorrect (Freydank n.d., https://berlingeschichte.de/bms/bmstext/9810prob.htm ). Most likely, therefore, it was staged in the Königsstädtisches Vaudeville Theater, which had opened in the Blumenstraße in Berlin in 1855 (http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Rudolf Cerf/de-de/, accessed 13 July 2021). After having been found out, Simonides had to pay back his money, and tried his luck elsewhere. He i.a. sold forged Greek papyri to the British art collector Mayer (see Peet 1920, p. 1; Bierbrier 2012, pp. 512–513). For this episode, see now also Gertzen 2022, pp. 40–41.

Mehlitz 2011
H. Mehlitz, Richard Lepsius: Ägypten und die Ordnung der Wissenschaft, Berlin, 2011.

Peet 1920
T.E. Peet, The Mayer Papyri A & B. Nos M. 11162 and M. 11186 of the Free Public Museums, Liverpool, London, 1920.

Bierbrier 2012
M.L. Bierbrier, Who Was Who in Egyptology, London, 2012 (4th ed.).

Gertzen 2022
T.L. Gertzen, “Eine allzu lange 2. Zwischenzeit. Die ersten Bemühungen zur Erstellung einer ägyptischen Chronologie, der falsche Uranios und Richard Lepsius als Historiker”, ZÄS 149, 2022, pp. 36–43.
 
Last edited:
Top