Steven Avery
Administrator
When the Textual Con-Men Collective make facual blunders, they don’t care, they don’t fix.
A Newly Digitized Bible Reveals the Origins of the King James Version (2024)
A one-of-a-kind Bible used by the King James translators offers a rare glimpse of their textual decisions.
Timothy Berg
https://textandcanon.org/a-newly-digitized-bible-reveals-the-origins-of-the-king-james-version/
This is just a sample of what this Bible reveals about the translators’ textual work. All the KJB’s notes that reflect textual variants were collected by F. H. A. Scrivener in 1910 and his list remains the best treatment of the translators as textual critics. Scrivener, however, never examined this document.
==========
Also posted on Twitter, no response.
https://x.com/textandcanon/status/1734214916062515678
"All the KJB’s notes that reflect textual variants were collected by F. H. A. Scrivener in 1910"
Scrivener (1813-1891) was not doing any textual work in 1910!
===========
https://archive.org/details/cu31924029268708/page/n254/mode/1up
A Newly Digitized Bible Reveals the Origins of the King James Version (2024)
A one-of-a-kind Bible used by the King James translators offers a rare glimpse of their textual decisions.
Timothy Berg
https://textandcanon.org/a-newly-digitized-bible-reveals-the-origins-of-the-king-james-version/
This is just a sample of what this Bible reveals about the translators’ textual work. All the KJB’s notes that reflect textual variants were collected by F. H. A. Scrivener in 1910 and his list remains the best treatment of the translators as textual critics. Scrivener, however, never examined this document.
==========
Also posted on Twitter, no response.
https://x.com/textandcanon/status/1734214916062515678
"All the KJB’s notes that reflect textual variants were collected by F. H. A. Scrivener in 1910"
Scrivener (1813-1891) was not doing any textual work in 1910!
===========
https://archive.org/details/cu31924029268708/page/n254/mode/1up
Last edited: