Peter Gurry "On Not Preferring the Shorter Reading: Matthew as a Test Case" fine paper looking at theorized lectio brevior verses

Steven Avery

Administrator
Wonderful paper , thanks!

The history of the canon is interesting.

Continuing the Facebook thread above:

===========================

Peter J. Gurry
"the principle’s original formulation by Griesbach, where the preference for the shorter reading is set alongside a preference for the longer reading"

Metzger did peg Wettstein earlier.

Chapters in the History of New Testament Textual Criticism (1963)
Recent Trends in the Textual Criticism of the Iliad and the Mahābhārata (1945)
Bruce Manning Metzger
http://books.google.com/books?id=noA3AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA153

J. J. Wettstein appears to be the first editor of the Greek Testament to formulate this canon fully. In his Prolegomena ad Novi Testamenti Graeci editionem accuratissimam (Amsterdam, 1730), p. lx, and again in his celebrated Novum Testamentum Graecumm, 11 (Amsterdam, 1752), 862, he laid down the rule that, "Inter duas variantes lectiones non protinus amplior atque prolixior breviori est praeferenda, sed contra potius," etc.

And Richard Porson, perhaps questionably, pointed to Jean Daillé (1694-1670) for lectio brevior in his argumentation against the heavenly witnesses. And I discuss that on a page called "The Rise and Fall of Lectio Brevior".
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Shorter reading discussion.

The Greek New Testament: Fourth Edition (2023)
Wayne A. Mitchell
https://www.academia.edu/108609695/The_Greek_New_Testament_Fourth_Edition

This text critical Greek New Testament 2nd Corrected Printing follows a revision of Griesbach concerning long and short readings. The critical apparatus has over 3,200 footnotes, often with versions and church fathers, and the appendix has 177 examples of homoioteleuton. The first three editions were published in digital format. The complete text with critical apparatus can also be viewed in the MySword Bible app, module MGNT. This preview is pre typesetting.

....

In 1796 J. J. Gricsbach published proposed rules for tcxl criticism,
and these have been viewed as having “laid the foundations of mod-
em text criticism.”5 One of Gricsbach’s suppositions was that “A
shorter reading, unless it is completely unsupported by early and
important witnesses, should be preferred to a fuller reading.” An-
other exception was that one should not prefer the shorter reading
“if an omission could have been caused by homoiotcleuton.”6 IIo-
moiotclcuton is a Greek word that means “similar ending,” and de-
scribes the error that occurs when the eye of a copyist skips from
the ending letters of a word to the same or similar ending letters of
a word farther in the manuscript, omitting all intervening text.

(continues with reference to the Peter Gurry paper.)
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Ironically, he is involved in a New Heart English Bible with Mark D. Harness using the corruption text.

Wayne A. Mitchell
Scribal Skips: 1300 Words That Fell Out of the Bible
https://www.lulu.com/shop/wayne-a-m...ebook/product-16y55jyz.html?page=1&pageSize=4

In nineteenth century textual criticism of the Bible, two beliefs that became prominent were that insertions of non-original text by scribes were much more numerous than copyist omissions of text, and that the shortest reading among manuscripts was preferable. Since that time, it has become recognized that the most common causes of textual corruption are accidental rather than intentional, and that among the most common accidental scribal errors is haplography. However, the implementation of these discoveries in textual analysis has been remarkably slow. As a result, a substantial number of words have accumulated with evidence of having fallen out of manuscripts, but have not been restored back to the Bible. In Scribal Skips, the author presents a list of verses from Genesis to Revelation with words restored that have evidence of having fallen out of manuscripts from scribal skips. “This book is an amazing feat of industry, and will be a very useful tool for both the text critic and the exegete.”

A Review of Scribal Skips (2020)
James Snapp review
https://www.academia.edu/41645215/A_Review_of_Scribal_Skips
 
Last edited:
Top