Steven Avery
Administrator
Those are three biggies, Scrivener definitely claims authorship of 1863 and 1867
There are others too.
There are others too.
Christian Remembrancer articles 1863, 1864, 1867 - all Scrivener?
- Thread starter Steven Avery
- Start date
Steven Avery
Administrator
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/KJV...24300881360&reply_comment_id=6818748324912277
That 1883 Scrivener note is a reference to the
Christian Remembrancer 1863 article p. 374-402
Review of two Tischendorf book
http://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA374
Curious about the 1863 is this note in Full Collation
https://archive.org/details/afullcollationc00scrigoog/page/n25/mode/1up
=====
Note that p. 375 has a note about the 1861 that again does not sound like Tischendorf
https://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA375
Of the original discovery and general character of the Codex Sinaiticus, we endeavoured to give some account in the Christian Remembrancer, January, 1861.
==============================
Scrivener also references in Plain Introduction
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA92
an October 1867 article in the Christian Remembrancer here that covers some questions relating to Vaticanus and Sinaiticus
Christian Remembrancer 1867 p. 405-429
The Great Vatican Manuscript of the Holy Bible
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA92
==============================
As for the 1864 article above, that is probably Scrivener, even without a definite reference, I will try to check my notes and connections in a few minutes.
========
Kutilek
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA24
This refers to the Mayer papyri article
Christopher Yetzer Absolutely. In Scrivener's Plain Intro. to the Text the NT, 3rd ed. (1883), p. 24, n. 2, he expressly claims authorship of the article in question. Oh, and thanks (grazie) for finding this online for those interested in consulting it.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/KJV...24300881360&reply_comment_id=6818748324912277
That 1883 Scrivener note is a reference to the
Christian Remembrancer 1863 article p. 374-402
Review of two Tischendorf book
http://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA374
Curious about the 1863 is this note in Full Collation
https://archive.org/details/afullcollationc00scrigoog/page/n25/mode/1up
=====
Note that p. 375 has a note about the 1861 that again does not sound like Tischendorf
https://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA375
Of the original discovery and general character of the Codex Sinaiticus, we endeavoured to give some account in the Christian Remembrancer, January, 1861.
==============================
Scrivener also references in Plain Introduction
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA92
an October 1867 article in the Christian Remembrancer here that covers some questions relating to Vaticanus and Sinaiticus
Christian Remembrancer 1867 p. 405-429
The Great Vatican Manuscript of the Holy Bible
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA92
==============================
As for the 1864 article above, that is probably Scrivener, even without a definite reference, I will try to check my notes and connections in a few minutes.
========
Kutilek
https://books.google.com/books?id=hZQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA24
This refers to the Mayer papyri article
Christopher Yetzer Absolutely. In Scrivener's Plain Intro. to the Text the NT, 3rd ed. (1883), p. 24, n. 2, he expressly claims authorship of the article in question. Oh, and thanks (grazie) for finding this online for those interested in consulting it.
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
1864 article
P. 175-208
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA175
175-189 - papyri
Churchill Babington 1858 - Funeral Panegyric - Hyperides
Herculaneum rolls
Pantocrator monastery Mt.. Athos
p. 184 - rule on ending a line ** see JSL April 1863 p.8
ascript CFA compared Sinaiticus and Bezae
Bohn’s Ed of GNT
tisch 7th
due to page # problems after 189
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA190
Long preparing Benedict
for Sinaiticus start at bottom of p.193
** note ref
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA193
https://www.google.com/books/editio...ancer_or_The_Church/jvoDAAAAQAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
https://www.google.com/books/editio...cer_or_The_Church/jvoDAAAAQAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=175
Are you sure this was written by F. H. A. Scrivener? I don't see his name.
Review of two books
July 1863? 1864?
Both Christopher and Kutilek mark this as Scrivener
P. 175-208
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA175
175-189 - papyri
Churchill Babington 1858 - Funeral Panegyric - Hyperides
Herculaneum rolls
Pantocrator monastery Mt.. Athos
p. 184 - rule on ending a line ** see JSL April 1863 p.8
ascript CFA compared Sinaiticus and Bezae
Bohn’s Ed of GNT
tisch 7th
due to page # problems after 189
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA190
Long preparing Benedict
for Sinaiticus start at bottom of p.193
** note ref
http://books.google.com/books?id=jvoDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA193
https://www.google.com/books/editio...ancer_or_The_Church/jvoDAAAAQAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
https://www.google.com/books/editio...cer_or_The_Church/jvoDAAAAQAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=175
Are you sure this was written by F. H. A. Scrivener? I don't see his name.
Review of two books
July 1863? 1864?
Both Christopher and Kutilek mark this as Scrivener
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
Christopher de Hamel
There is a long and useful article by F. H. A. Scrivener, ‘Constantine Simonides and His Biblical Studies’, in the guise of a review of Fac-Similes and of Tischendorfs publication of the Sinaiticus New Testament in The Christian Remembrancer, 46, July 1863, pp. 175-208, again rehearsing and refining the stages of the discoveries and critically assessing the accompanying claims.
There is a long and useful article by F. H. A. Scrivener, ‘Constantine Simonides and His Biblical Studies’, in the guise of a review of Fac-Similes and of Tischendorfs publication of the Sinaiticus New Testament in The Christian Remembrancer, 46, July 1863, pp. 175-208, again rehearsing and refining the stages of the discoveries and critically assessing the accompanying claims.