Steven Avery
Administrator
Q78-F8v
blotches on the Kirsopp Lake pictures - the ink is much bolder than the CSP
- Thread starter Steven Avery
- Start date
Steven Avery
Administrator
Codex Sinaiticus : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Codex Sinaiticus
archive.org
Codex Sinaiticus : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Codex Sinaiticus
archive.org
Steven Avery
Administrator
CSP
Codex Sinaiticus - See The Manuscript | Luke |
Codex Sinaiticus is one of the most important books in the world. Handwritten well over 1600 years ago, the manuscript contains the Christian Bible in Greek, including the oldest complete copy of the New Testament. The Codex Sinaiticus Project is an international collaboration to reunite the...
codexsinaiticus.org
Steven Avery
Administrator
83-84
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n83/mode/2up
Alternate Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/details/per_the...w-te_helen-and-kirsopp-lake/page/n92/mode/2up
Mark, 16:1 - 16:8 / Luke, 1:1 - 1:18 library: BL folio: 228 scribe: D
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...&book=35&chapter=1&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Lake has bold ink where 2009 CSP is faded!
Did it fade over a century?
Is this common?
Will
.
Close up it is still faded
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n83/mode/2up
Alternate Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/details/per_the...w-te_helen-and-kirsopp-lake/page/n92/mode/2up
Mark, 16:1 - 16:8 / Luke, 1:1 - 1:18 library: BL folio: 228 scribe: D
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...&book=35&chapter=1&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Lake has bold ink where 2009 CSP is faded!
Did it fade over a century?
Is this common?
Close up it is still faded
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
87-88
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n87/mode/2up
Alternate Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/details/per_the...w-te_helen-and-kirsopp-lake/page/n97/mode/2up
CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=7&lid=en&quireNo=77&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Darker close up
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n87/mode/2up
Alternate Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/details/per_the...w-te_helen-and-kirsopp-lake/page/n97/mode/2up
CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=7&lid=en&quireNo=77&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Darker close up
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n105/mode/2up
Q78-8v
Luke, 14:3 - 14:34 library: BL folio: 239b scribe: A
CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=8&lid=en&quireNo=78&side=v&zoomSlider=0
Where Lake is blotchy the CSP is lighter, did he adjust control or reverse the negative.
https://archive.org/details/codexsinaiticus_201907/page/n105/mode/2up
Q78-8v
Luke, 14:3 - 14:34 library: BL folio: 239b scribe: A
CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=8&lid=en&quireNo=78&side=v&zoomSlider=0
Where Lake is blotchy the CSP is lighter, did he adjust control or reverse the negative.
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
Last edited:
Steven Avery
Administrator
https://www.facebook.com/groups/digital.eureka/posts/6182046545231456/
Also Palaeography Forum
The palaeography determinations of Codex Sinaiticus have had very little input from physical in-person manuscript examinations. Generally until recently the "consensus" was reached using the Tischendorf typeset books, which were designed to hide features that might cause problems, and there were photos c. 1911. (By then the consensus had been established by the big Tischendorf push, along with Westcott and Hort using the early date for their textual criticism theories.)
And I was comparing the Kirsopp Lake pictures of Sinaiticus c. 1911 with the Codex Sinaiticus pictures that went online in 2009. I will put one page below.
Notice:
much darker ink on the Kirsopp Lake pics
blotches
Was Kirsopp Lake using techniques to enhance the ink? Has there been ink fade in the century since the pics? Any ideas you have, very much appreciated!
SOURCES
Codex Sinaiticus Petropolitanus, The New Testament the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas
Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/.../codexsinaiticu.../page/n105/mode/2up
Codex Sinaiticus Project
Q78-8v Luke, 14:3 - 14:34 library: BL folio: 239b scribe: A CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx...
Also Palaeography Forum
The palaeography determinations of Codex Sinaiticus have had very little input from physical in-person manuscript examinations. Generally until recently the "consensus" was reached using the Tischendorf typeset books, which were designed to hide features that might cause problems, and there were photos c. 1911. (By then the consensus had been established by the big Tischendorf push, along with Westcott and Hort using the early date for their textual criticism theories.)
And I was comparing the Kirsopp Lake pictures of Sinaiticus c. 1911 with the Codex Sinaiticus pictures that went online in 2009. I will put one page below.
Notice:
much darker ink on the Kirsopp Lake pics
blotches
Was Kirsopp Lake using techniques to enhance the ink? Has there been ink fade in the century since the pics? Any ideas you have, very much appreciated!
SOURCES
Codex Sinaiticus Petropolitanus, The New Testament the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas
Kirsopp Lake
https://archive.org/.../codexsinaiticu.../page/n105/mode/2up
Codex Sinaiticus Project
Q78-8v Luke, 14:3 - 14:34 library: BL folio: 239b scribe: A CSP
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx...
Last edited: