KJVToday
https://sites.google.com/site/kjvtoday/home/q-arent-older-manuscripts-more-reliable
https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Are_Older_Manuscripts_More_Reliable
The scribe skipped the following underlined words of John 16:15 due to the repetition of the same words:
"εκεινος...
John 16:15 (AV)
All things that the Father hath are mine:
therefore said I, that he shall take of mine,
and shall shew it unto you.
=====================================
John 16:14-16 (AV)
He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. All things that the...
John 3:20 - ca
John 3:21 - ca
https://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?__VIEWSTATEGENERATOR=01FB804F&dir=next&folioNo=1&lid=en&quireNo=80&side=v&zoomSlider=0
John 4:45 - ca...
CARM
https://forums.carm.org/threads/codex-sinaiticus-the-facts.12990/post-1487344
In Romans the large omissions are at:
Romans 8:1 - Ca
Romans 9:28 - Ca
Romans 10:15 - Ca
Romans 11:6 - Ca
Romans 11:30 - S1 followed by Ca
Romans 15:24 - Ca
Correction at 16:19 - Ca
You are helping to show...
Dirk Jongkind
(also check words like omission)
omissions - 48 hits
p. 46
Cancel Sheet Analysis
p. 133 Singular readings
p. 134
p. 139 - lectio brevior (no homoeoteleuton, just an interesting continuation)
p. 178 - Psalms
p. 208
Are there many uncorrected ?
How do the corrections show up in the apparatus?
How many does Dirk Jongkind give?
Do any other papers give this special attention.
Is there a master list?
Two questions come to mind
1) what is the distribution of homoeoteleuton corrections in the NT, are any late, especially check Revelation
Revelation 4:3 ... ca
Revelation 4:5 ... ca
Revelation 5:1 .. ca
2) when there is a correction which, the original or the correction, is Aleph* entry in...