Prolegomena 1999 French ? translated
The manuscript is composed of very thin sheets of parchment, carefully prepared; clans quite rare cases, a defect of the skin or a preparation accident gave birth to a small circular hole, circumvented by the scribe when copying. Quite a number of stains and some tears are due to the use of the volume; except in one case (at pp. 355-356, or the outer upper part of the sheet has been removed), they do not seriously compromise reading. Too acidic ink has more than once corrodes, even pierces the parchment; it is rare either to the detriment of readability.
The sheets are arranged according to the so-called law of Gregory: the "flesh" and "hair" dimensions are in gaze and the notebook begins with the flesh side.
Milestones, pierced by means of an instrument of circular section, of very reduced, guide the drawing of the ruler lines. For the vertical lines, they are pierced clans the upper and lower margins, very close of the current edge (which has been quite heavily trimmed); for the horizontal lines, they are located at a distance of 58 to 90 mm from the outer edge of the sheet 5); they therefore fall in the last column of writing, as in the Sinaiticus, by example; and, as in this last manuscript, the last bottom hole is often double 6),
6). Period, not comma
The precise determination of how has been drawn the ruler still poses problems, but one can only emphasize the great regularity of the layout.
It seems like all the lines are drawn on the flesh side. Such an effect normally results from the application of system 2 in the nomenclature of Leroy7l, where the leaves (or bifolios) are settled one by one on the flesh side. Home remains a little perplexed by the fact that often the vertical lines are much stronger than the horizontals, and that both sometimes vary in intensity within the same notebook8l. However, a system with printing from one sheet to another would suppose, for arrive at the current arrangement of "hollows" and "reliefs", complicated manipulations, for which we do not see the reason.
As to the type, or design formed by the rule 9), two major solutions have been adopted, whether it's the three-column layout or of that with two columns, reserved for books sapiential: the difference comes from the way of draw the horizontal lines. The verticals present as follows: in the three-way layout columns, six vertical lines, drawn from the top at the bottom of the page, delimit the three columns10); in the one with two columns, each of them is delimited on the left and on the right by two lines, fairly spaced out: the first line on the left indicates the place where the stique begins, the second, the one where it continues, set back from at first; the two straight lines have the same function, but for the other side of sheet 11). The horizontal lines, in the most common type, each correspond to a line of text; the first and the last are drawn without interruption of the first vertical on the left at the last on the right; more than once, however, the extensions between the columns are indistinguishable 12): perhaps they were never drawn. The other rectors are limited within each of the two or three columns. In a second type, all the horizontal lines are drawn without interruption from the first vertical on the left to the last on the right; but the majority of them are executed according to the formula: one line drawn for two written; exceptions are a few “close” lines (according to the formula: one line drawn for one written) up and possibly down; three solutions have been adopted: 1° five close lines up and two down 13); 2° four above only 14); 3° three above and two below 15); waypoints are regularly spaced ad hoc 16) and it will be noted that a process very similar is used in Sinaiticus 17).
2. MATERIAL, LAYOUT, STITCHING AND RULING
That is just part two of the Prolegomena. There is a lot more you can copy and run through a French translator and go over. I was just sitting in my LazyBoy on my phone, and saw that section and thought it might help,