twofold signification of the three crosses note - Wright and Simonides - David W. Daniels analysis

[Steven Avery]

The Christian remembrancer - Volume 45 1863
Imperial Edition of the Codex Sinaiticus
https://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA397

"But although I possess many proofs of the spuriousness of the manuscript, I shall keep silent on these for the present. First, because I intend to write a special work on the subject, and secondly, because the Codex will prove this itself when published, and the portion already published partly shows this, and if you understood the twofold signification of the note which exists at the end of the fourth column of the eighth page of the pseudo-Frederico-Augustine Codex, you would repent of what both you and your patrons have stirred up against me inconsiderately.' -

Simonides, Jan 21, 1863, letter to the Guardian

 

[Steven Avery]

manuscript - three crosses note - 2023
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=5&lid=en&quireNo=35&side=r&zoomSlider=0

 

[Steven Avery]

Constantine Simonides and Codex Sinaiticus - fragments in book covers and bindings and in disordered heaps, in baskets etc

Dating Greek script, requires paleographic qualifications, as well as experience. Your opinion is neither qualified, nor experienced in the study of dating Greek paleography. Provide a detailed explanation of your (note YOUR) Greek paleographic dating methodology? We were discussing the...

forums.carm.org

So where does Simonides reference the "three crosses note" and what is your evidence for it being contemporaneous with Sinaiticus?

three crosses note on the manuscript
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=5&lid=en&quireNo=35&side=r&zoomSlider=0

First the Simonides reference:

The Reader (1863)
William Aldis Wright - Jan 13, 1863
https://books.google.com/books?id=fX1NAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA69

I will add one note from the "Codex Friderico-Augustanus ." In the fourth column of the reverse of the fourth folio, the scribe , without even beginning a fresh line, breaks off from 1 Chr. xix. 17 to 2 Esdr. ix. 11. At the bottom of the column are three crosses, and a note to the effect that up to the sign of the three crosses extend the seven superfluous leaves, which do not belong to Esdras. his mistake might have been made by an ancient copyist , but not by one who had before him the Moscow edition of the Old and New Testaments

.
The Christian remembrancer - Volume 45, 1863
Imperial Edition of the Codex Sinaiticus
Constantine Simonides - Jan 23, 1863
https://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA397

"But although I possess many proofs of the spuriousness of the manuscript, I shall keep silent on these for the present. First, because I intend to write a special work on the subject, and secondly, because the Codex will prove this itself when published, and the portion already published partly shows this, and if you understood the twofold signification of the note which exists at the end of the fourth column of the eighth page of the pseudo-Frederico-Augustine Codex, you would repent of what both you and your patrons have stirred up against me inconsiderately."

Simonides, Jan 21, 1863, letter to the Guardian

 

[Steven Avery]

David - Who Faked p. 344- 347

Some earlier.