Steven Avery
Administrator
The attempts are amazing.
James Snapp
Elijah Hixson
Jacob Peterson
British Library
On this thread we will plan on coalescing the earlier attempts and adding new material
the conservation and storage games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.268
the colour photography games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.267
James Snapp on colour disparity - "As far as I can tell, they do not vary in color"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.594
James Snapp attempts to defend authenticity of Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.468
there must be another explanation for the colour and staining anomalies of the 1844 and 1859 Sinaiticus sections
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.527
why the Sinaiticus and textual and manuscript scholars do not want to touch the real issues
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.487
responses from those involved in textual criticism
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.239
British Library - and other - modern comments on research and condition and colour
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.191
reasons, excuses, confusions - circularity
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.197
Some, like Tommy Wasserman, just dance away from the question.
Note: I am not including the ones about the "phenomenally good condition", the easy-peasy page turning suppleness.
===================
Plus these threads could all be put in one sub-forum.
===================
James Snapp
Elijah Hixson
Jacob Peterson
British Library
On this thread we will plan on coalescing the earlier attempts and adding new material
the conservation and storage games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.268
the colour photography games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.267
James Snapp on colour disparity - "As far as I can tell, they do not vary in color"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.594
James Snapp attempts to defend authenticity of Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.468
there must be another explanation for the colour and staining anomalies of the 1844 and 1859 Sinaiticus sections
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.527
why the Sinaiticus and textual and manuscript scholars do not want to touch the real issues
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.487
responses from those involved in textual criticism
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.239
British Library - and other - modern comments on research and condition and colour
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.191
reasons, excuses, confusions - circularity
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.197
Some, like Tommy Wasserman, just dance away from the question.
Note: I am not including the ones about the "phenomenally good condition", the easy-peasy page turning suppleness.
===================
Plus these threads could all be put in one sub-forum.
===================
Last edited: