perplexing peptide paper

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Steven Avery @StevenAveryNY
June 20
Replying to @Chris_F_Carson @jeremyrhammond and 4 others
These "Sars-Cov2" 1,000,000,000 entities (green) are all identical?
Recognized by a PCR test? Info is sketchy.

Yet they were cultured in some cell that is not the virus claimed normal
habitat? (e.g. lung tissues.)

Where are the thousands or millions of burst cells?

Thanks!

Steven url
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/status/1406613266747568135?s=20

==================================

Steven Avery @StevenAveryNY
June 21
No answer from Christine.

And I wonder if she even looked at the paper beyond the one pic :).

Christine, what did they do with the million or so burst cells? To get those
billion viral escapees!

Why not try again? Justify the theory of viruses hijacking cell replication.

Steven url
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/status/1406826436187545603?s=20

==================================

Christine Carson
@Chris_F_Carson
June 20, 2021
Replying to @StevenAveryNY @jeremyrhammond and 4 others

Viruses have genomes coding for a subset of replication processes

The remaining required processes are out-sourced from cells

If the virus finds & enters a cell with the complementary processes,
virus replication can occur
Cells vary
Viruses vary
The match has to be just right

Christine url
https://twitter.com/Chris_F_Carson/status/1406777614522413057?s=20

==================================

Christine Carson @Chris_F_Carson
June 21
Replying to @StevenAveryNY @jeremyrhammond and 4 others
You asked
"what is hard evidence that it occurs?
eg Are there cultures with 1,000 broken cells &1,000,000 viruses released
from the cells?"

I showed evidence of the process

Now, in the face of the evidence you asked for,
you're changing the question

#SARSCoV2 viruses replicate

Christine url
https://twitter.com/Chris_F_Carson/status/1406850818012114947?s=20

==================================
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY
Steven Avery @StevenAveryNY
June 21
Replying to @Chris_F_Carson @jeremyrhammond and 4 others

You showed a paper of no value to our question. Presuppositional city.

Then you tried: "Cells vary Viruses vary The match has to be just right."

Tells us nothing.

Why Christine's shifting answers give no evidence of viruses hijacking cell replication.
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/perplexing-peptide-paper.1947/#post-7537

Steven url
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/status/1407053185529823233?s=20

==================================
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Why Christine's shifting answers give no evidence of viruses hijacking cell replication.

First, the paper is worthless, with all sorts of holes. It was not designed to show cell replication.
Christine got excited because there a billion parts of something after 72 hours, in the green line.

One major problem is the thousands, or millions, of broken cells that would be in the culture.
(If in fact the billion parts were viruses that were created in cell replication.)

Where did they go? Why are they unmentioned?

Christine gave no answer.

Another is the ultra-adaptability. After all, that culture cells are not the type of tissue that is supposed
to be a host, like human lung tissue.

And using the totally unreliable PCR test is another. It is not designed for this purpose.

And her methodology is circular.
It is using the genomes that are filled in with computer speculation numbers.

==================

Second, they would have to be a controlled experiment.

Stefan Lanka pointed this out:

Dr. Stefan Lanka 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception - July 21, 2020
Makia Freeman
https://thefreedomarticles.com/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-reveals-virus-misconception/

“All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.”

” … the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to … scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus propagation” … scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances … to the cell culture.”

“These control experiment have never been carried out by the official “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged “infected” material.”
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top