Luke 4:31 - down to Capernaum

Steven Avery

Administrator
Luke 4:16
And he came to Nazareth,
where he had been brought up:
and, as his custom was,
he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day,
and stood up for to read.

Luke 4:31
And came down to Capernaum,
a city of Galilee,
and taught them on the sabbath days.


From Har Nitai or Arbel you can see down to Capernaum.
And it really is .. DOWN.

I'll see if I can find a picture.
Here is one (and tap on it with the mouse to enlarge.)
http://www.bibleplaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/1.4-Jezreel-Valley.jpg
From modern Nazareth you would take a long road through Galilee. This language does not fit.

(I will plan on finding my pics.)

On that map it is across the hilly area to "Cana?", then down to the Turan Valley, then back up and across the Galilee hills, taking the valley route between Nitai (not on map) and Arbel, which is the Khirbet Wadi Hamam (synagogue unearthed there) then finally through to the Kinneret and up to Capernaum. There is no way that "down to Capernaum" is sensible writing.

Conzelmann points this out in The Theology of St. Luke (1954 German, English 1961).
Here is the report from Karel Hanhart.


=====
The Theology of St. Luke
https://archive.org/details/lish00hans/page/38/mode/1up
4. The Beginnings: [Capernaum (Luke iv, 31-44)
We will note in the first place certain geographical details. It is of course geographically correct to say that Jesus comes ‘down’ to Capemaum, but this does not necessarily imply an accurate geographical knowledge on Luke’s part. kara might well be deduced from the incorrect idea that Nazareth stands on a hill. A fller elucidation of the geographical reference (noXiv Trjs raXiXoJas) is not of itself of significance (cf. the statements
concerning Bethsaida and Nain); but the question arises whether
the phrase might not have a special point in view of the contrast
drawn between the two towns, no doubt in line with Luke's
ideas concerning the Galileans. Most remarkable of all, how-
ever, is the fact that we are not told anywhere in Luke that
Capernaum!s situated by the lake. Yet the fact that it is situated
here is part and parcel of many of the traditions. Simon the
fisherman has his home here (iv, 38). It cannot be an accidental
====
Hans Conzelmann wrote his groundbreaking pioneering work on Lukan geography and theology in his book The Theology of St. Luke (originally published in German as Die Mitte der Zeit in 1954). [1, 2]
====

Studies in John (1970)
Karel Hanhart
https://books.google.com/books?id=ZnweAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA31


"the going 'down' to Capernaum, while Nazareth does not stand on a hill (p. 39)"


On that occasion he quoted the proverb that a prophet has no honor in his own country. The intent of Luke’s remark, “And he went down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee (31)” is to show how the rejection of Jesus’ own people leads to a mission among strangers.5

1788490794287.png


This is actually showing both that Nazareth is not on the brow of a hill, and that down to Capernaum does not fit.

==============


John 2:11-12 (AV)
This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee,
and manifested forth his glory;
and his disciples believed on him.
After this he went down to Capernaum,
he, and his mother, and his brethren,
and his disciples:
and they continued there not many days.

Luke 4:23 (AV)
And he said unto them,
Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself:
whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country.


Steven
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
what writers point out that down to capernaum is an awkward description from the currently accepted Nazareth to Cap

1. Hans Conzelmann (Geographical Ignorance Argument)
In his influential mid-20th-century work on Lucan geography, German New Testament scholar Hans Conzelmann famously argued that Luke’s travel phrases were awkward and flawed. Conzelmann claimed that the only reason Luke wrote that Jesus "went down to Capernaum" was because the author held an "incorrect idea that Nazareth stands on a hill". [1]

  • The Irony: Later historians and archaeologists widely rejected Conzelmann's critique because historical Nazareth was built on a hillside, making Luke's choice of words geographically precise despite Conzelmann calling it a clumsy mistake. [1]
2. Albert Schwegler & Jason BeDuhn (The Marcionite Priority / "Sky-Descent" Theory)
Writers looking at the relationship between the canonical Gospel of Luke and Marcion's early text, the Evangelion, point out a major narrative awkwardness (or aporia). [1]
In Marcion’s version, the text begins abruptly with: "In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar... Jesus came down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee." Because Marcion believed Jesus was a cosmic entity who appeared fully grown, "came down" originally meant descending straight from heaven. [, 2]
Scholars operating under the Schwegler Hypothesis (initiated by 19th-century theologian Albert Schwegler and explored by modern text critics like Jason BeDuhn) argue that: [1, 2]

  • The canonical author added the humanizing story of Jesus in Nazareth (Luke 4:16–30) before the Capernaum episode to emphasize His human, Jewish origins. [, 2]
  • When they stitched these two texts together, they left the phrase "came down to Capernaum," awkwardly turning what was originally a theological, cosmic descent from the clouds into a sudden, physical mountain hike down from Nazareth. [1]

3. Redaction Critics on the Luke 4:23 Paradox
Other literary analysts note that the transition from Nazareth to Capernaum in Luke creates an awkward narrative paradox. In Luke 4:23, while Jesus is still in Nazareth, he tells the townsfolk: "Do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in Capernaum." Yet, Jesus does not actually travel "down to Capernaum" until after this event, in verse 31. Writers use this clunky chronological inversion to argue that the narrative scaffolding between the two towns was heavily re-edited or artificially arranged. []
If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you want to look deeper into ancient Galilean topography or the debates surrounding Marcion's Evangelion.
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Teaching in Kefar Nahum
Joshua N. Tilton & David N. Bivin [1939-2026] 25Oct2023 LOY Commentary
A clash between entrenched demonic powers and one proclaiming the Kingdom of Heaven.

Conzelmann (38-39) argued that although it is true that Capernaum lies at a lower elevation than Nazareth, the only reason Luke wrote that Jesus “went down to Capernaum” was his “incorrect idea that Nazareth stands on a hill.” Conzelmann’s reasoning is difficult for us to understand because Nazareth was located on a hillside. See D. C. Pellett, “Nazareth,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (5 vols.; Nashville: Abingdon, 1962), 3:524-526, esp. 525; Yardenna Alexandre, “The Settlement History of Nazareth in the Iron Age and Early Roman Period,” ‘Atiqot 98 (2020): 25-92, esp. 27.
↩
 
Top