Konstantinos Oikonomos (1780-1857)
who was the Greek luther in the paper by luciano bossina
(in Genius)
In the scholarship of classical philologist Luciano Bossina, the "Greek Luther" refers to
Constantine Oikonomos (also known as Konstantinos Oikonomos ex Oikonomon), a prominent 19th-century Greek Orthodox theologian, scholar, and figure of the Greek Enlightenment. [
1,
2]
He earned this nickname due to his monumental efforts in translating and advocating for the Septuagint, his extensive writings on Orthodox reform, and his complex engagement with both Eastern Christian traditions and Western ideas.
If you want to dive deeper, tell me:
- Are you looking for his specific writings (such as his monumental work on the Septuagint)?
- Would you like to know more about his views on Protestantism and the Western Reformation?
Let me know how you'd like to
explore his historical impact.
========================
what connections and views did he have on Constantine Simonides
The connection between
Constantine Oikonomos and the notorious 19th-century Greek manuscript forger
Constantine Simonides was defined by a shift from
initial academic curiosity to severe condemnation, public exposure, and deep contempt. [
1,
2]
As detailed in text-critical history and analyzed by scholars like Luciano Bossina, their interaction is one of the most remarkable chapters of 19th-century palaeographic forgery. [
1,
2]
1. The Bait: The Septuagint and the "Letter of Aristeas"
In 1849, Oikonomos published the fourth volume of his monumental, highly regarded text-critical work on the Septuagint. In this volume, he included the ancient
Letter of Aristeas (a primary historical source discussing the origin of the Greek Septuagint translation), heavily annotated with his own textual corrections, emendations, and unique phrasing. [
1]
Simonides saw an opportunity to exploit the old theologian's passion for the
Septuagint. Within a few months, Simonides claimed to have discovered an extraordinarily ancient, pristine parchment roll of the
Letter of Aristeas in the monasteries of Mount Athos. He personally presented these manuscript rolls to
Oikonomos, expecting the venerable scholar to validate them. [
1,
2]
2. The Exposure: The Forger Foiled by His Own Source
Oikonomos initially looked at the manuscript but immediately recognized it as a total fabrication.
Simonides had made a critical blunder: to construct his "ancient" text, he had directly copied the textual corrections and notes from Oikonomos’s freshly printed 1849 book. [
1,
2]
Most damningly, Simonides accidentally penned a specific Greek title into the parchment—
Αριστης συγγραφή—a stylized phrasing that Oikonomos had invented entirely from his own eloquent pen for his publication. Oikonomos instantly realized that Simonides had used his own modern scholarship to fabricate an "ancient" manuscript. [
1]
3. Oikonomos's Views on Simonides
Following this incident, Oikonomos's view of Simonides permanently solidified into
total academic contempt and moral condemnation. [
1]
- The "Dangerous Man": Oikonomos began aggressively warning other scholars and ecclesiastical figures to stay away from Simonides, branding him a highly skilled but "dangerous man". [1, 2]
- Ecclesiastical Opposition: Oikonomos used his immense influence within the Greek Orthodox Church to raise alarms about Simonides's broader operations, viewing his historical fabrications as a threat to the integrity of sacred texts and church history. [1, 2]
4. Historical Irony and Later Echoes
The relationship adds a layer of historical irony to the "Simonides Affair". Years later, when Simonides famously tried to derail Western biblical scholarship by claiming that
he had forged the famous
Codex Sinaiticus in 1840, Western scholars like Konstantin von Tischendorf were able to confidently dismiss him.
Tischendorf explicitly cited Oikonomos's early exposure of the Aristeas forgery as the definitive proof of Simonides's fraudulent character, noting that he should have listened to the "venerable old man's" early warnings sooner. [
1,
2,
3,
4]
If you would like to explore this further, let me know:
- Would you like details on the other specific forgeries Simonides attempted to pass off to Greek scholars?
- Are you interested in how Konstantin von Tischendorf used Oikonomos’s findings to defend the authenticity of Codex Sinaiticus?
Let me know what
aspect of this text-critical battle you want to focus on next!
