Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: sense-line homoeoteleutons fit with Claromontanus as source for Sinaiticus

  1. Default sense-line homoeoteleutons fit with Claromontanus as source for Sinaiticus

    This was a rather amazing discovery.
    Right in the sweet spot of the textual critics.


    Codex Sinaiticus Authenticity Research
    Homeoteleuton - Text Omitted Because Of Similar Endings
    http://www.sinaiticus.net/homeoteleuton.html


    The web page gives a nice picture of what and occurred
    And this leads to a number of pages, which right now focus on four cases. (There are more.)


    =================

    homoeoteleuton textbook case ( 1 Corinthians 13:1-2) – W. R. Meyer
    https://app.box.com/s/jnbxtg8et442xtsobklq8k830bwpyvnw

    homoeoteleuton’s layman’s guide – Steven Avery
    https://app.box.com/s/teozkmv0ifshfwdjne4vsgkmjlzjs4sn

    discovery of homoeoteleutons – W.R. Meyer
    A discovery of apparent homoeoteleutons in the Codex Sinaiticus (x)
    https://app.box.com/s/2k4ihkp6op1appn4fw5egvsiw2kw01v2

    1 Corinthians 2:14-15
    https://app.box.com/s/4bwxnlvbqzcugckh8wwem2lpx39yf5jk

    2 Corinthians 4:17
    https://app.box.com/s/pf5eukn01i54q2sn2qzul88rr3u19y5o

    Galatians 2:8
    https://app.box.com/s/glglw14e41yehi0cs518f8ml4g3g954u

    =================

    Forums

    Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)
    http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewt...=2936&start=20

    =================

  2. Default NT sense-lines considered to be a sixth-century phenomenon

    Encountering New Testament Manuscripts: A Working Introduction to Textual Criticism (1980)
    Jack Finegan
    https://books.google.com/books?id=fIcU1BFiMBgC&pg=PA40

    §40. Codex Claromontanus (DP), in Paris, contains the thirteen Pauline Letters, then the so-called Canon Claromontanus, which will be described momentarily, and after that, probably added later, the Letter to the Hebrews. Again, the manuscript is bilingual, with the Greek on the left and the Latin on the right, and the pages are written colometrically, with twenty-one lines on the page (for sample pages of Greek and Latin, see Vogels, Specimina, Pis. 20-21). In this case the Latin is relatively independent of the Greek, and has been shown to be for the most part identical with the Latin text used by Lucifer of Cagliari in Sardinia in the fourth century (Souter p. 26). The so-called Canon Claromontanus, which stands in this manuscript immediately after the Letter to Philemon, is an incomplete list of the books of the OT and the NT, together with the number of lines in each. Written here in Latin, the list may go back to a Greek original of around A.D. 300. In its NT portion the list is reproduced in Souter pp. 194f. Reference in the Canon to the number of lines in a book is with the Latin word versus ...
    So now, New Testament science will have to theorize that sense-lines, generally seen as a late Greek-Latin diglot phenomenon, occurred much earlier in the Greek transmission line. However, the "scholars" have been so busy trying to shore up Sinaiticus authenticity that they showed no interest in the textual phenomenon of these homoeoteleutons!

    Sidenote:
    The Canon Claromontanus may have helped guide the Sinaiticus book order.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •