Quote Originally Posted by Steven Avery View Post
The BCHF forum (with a widely diverse contribution base) discussion represents an area where at least a good number of the participants asked probing questions. Peter Kirby and Andrew Criddle and Stephen Huller (who related to us the views of David Trobisch) are three on that forum. That may get a special section or thread
With the establishment types doing everything they possibly can to avoid discussing the evidences that Sinaiticus is an 1800s production, I want to highlight one forum that shows that it really is possible to have informed counterpoint discussion.

Bible Criticism and History Forum


Codex Sinaiticus - the white parchment Friderico-Augustanus
begins Oct 29, 2014 - 20 pages
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1017

Hermas, Barnabas linguistic, history anomalies
begins Oct 31, 2014 - 4 pages
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1025

non-invasive testing of inks, parchment, stains and threads
begins Nov 12, 2014 - 2 pages
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewt...lit=sinaiticus

Coloring the Truth: Sinaiticus - 2016 - 1 pages
begins Jan 7, 2016 - 1 page
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2071

Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)
begins Feb 28, 2017 - 4 pages
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2936


============================

Minor

Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?
begins Oct 1, 2014 - 1 page
http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=930

============================

Originally posted at:
http://www.purebibleforum.com/showth...&p=868#post868

Information checked on Feb, 2018

Partly included here, will update to include all major
http://www.purebibleforum.com/showth...p?87-resources