Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Default support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament

    Auxiliary info:

    Facebook - PureBible
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/pure...6435479448332/

    sister thread
    Daniel Wallace makes constructio ad sensum theory out of CT corruptions, often ultra-minority
    http://www.purebibleforum.com/showth...ultra-minority
    ==============================

    support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament


    Confessions of a member of the church of England occasioned by a laborious examination of the work of William Jones: "The Catholic Doctrine of a Trinity" (1830)
    John Shaw
    https://books.google.com/books?id=ubFNAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA84

    "Now it will be found, upon a careful examination of the three chapters I have mentioned, that in every instance where the masculine article and pronoun are used, the Paraclete is either the expressed or obviously implied antecedent."
    The whole section is a good read.
    Last edited by Steven Avery; 10-11-2018 at 05:45 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •