Search:

Type: Posts; User: Steven Avery

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. when did Simonides first share that he was involved in the production of Codex Sinaiticus

    Publicly, in Sept 3, 1862 in the Guardian. (This is well-known.)

    ===================

    Plus in the letters, it is explained that he shared that much earlier.

    ===================

    In a letter...
  2. BCHF - a pleasant contrast to the gate-keepers and suppression attempts

    With the establishment types doing everything they possibly can to avoid discussing the evidences that Sinaiticus is an 1800s production, I want to highlight one forum that shows that it really is...
  3. ending of Mark usage - Euesbius to Jerome and dozens of post Nicea church writers

    Here we will note a couple of comments about the mss as well.
  4. the history of the modernist and contra authenticity positions - fighting the pure Reformation Bible

    Our starting point is planned to be Erasmus.
  5. short summary of the massive extenal evidences for the traditional ending.

    For simplicity and clarity
  6. Snapp, Lunn and Hester are trojan horse authenticity positions - Burgon, Robinson, Hills and others are fine

    be careful!
  7. 99.9% of the Greek, Latin and Syriac mss support the traditional ending

    99.9% of the Greek, Latin and Syriac mss support the traditional ending
  8. early church writers - references, usages and allusions - Ante-Nicene

    Irenaeus and many others will be documented here.
  9. external evidences - approaches of Snapp, Hester, Lunn reviewed and compared

    This section will look at the three main modern resources, and auxiliary resources and give my perspectives on how they handle the external evidences.
  10. when in the 1850s was the Sinaiticus ms coloured?

    Uspensky saw the ms. in 1845 and 1850, and called it white parchment.

    The section that went to Leipzig was white parchment in 1844, and is white parchment today. And was noted as white parchment...
  11. textualcriticism forum

    Textual Criticism forum on YahooGroups

    To be added here.
  12. Sinaiticus Gate-keeping 101

    One major add to the points above that have not been addressed by the textual scholars, to be added to the ones above, that has radically changed in the period since 2009:

    a) the 1844 white...
  13. Tommy Wasserman - Sinaiticus gate-keeper

    Facebook - The Lying Pen of the Scribes
    Roberta Mazza post
    https://www.facebook.com/roberta.mazza.3762/posts/10154966518091840
  14. Barnabas edition - emendations and historical speculattions previously proposed by modern scholars

    Quote from Donaldson about proposed emendations that made it into Barnabas
    http://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=21748

    This is very similar to the phenomenon of gearing a forgery to...
  15. Sticky: salient arguments that authenticity defenders do not address

    salient arguments that authenticity defenders do not address
    http://www.purebibleforum.com/showthread.php?511-salient-arguments-that-authenticity-defenders-do-not-address

    Placed in the David...
  16. Sticky: decoloration - and does colouring of ms prove non-ancient text and ms?

    > Question
    > could there have been "decoloration"

    There is great difficulty finding any explanation for the pristine white parchment condition of the 43 folia in Leipzig. The ms. was supposed...
  17. If the 1859 St. Petersburg manuscript is artifically coloured, can it still be ancient and authentic ?

    This is a good question, raised by a top scholar, in proper consideration of some of the Sinaiticus history.

    And the answer gets to the heart of the competitive origin accounts of Simonides and...
  18. Christian Remembrancer - 1863...

    Christian Remembrancer - 1863
    https://books.google.com/books?id=rPQDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA379
  19. more about the Melbourne

    Report on the materials we have from Melbourne

    "I think it was as the accession number is H17839 which is in Box 109/4(a-d), but in the 91 pages copied are materials from both H17838 [Uranius] and...
  20. do we have all of the original St. Catherine's New Finds material?

    Stanley Porter makes a comment in his book that seems to question whether we have all the Sinai Monastery material. The implication is that some New Finds material was lost or discarded.

    I...
  21. arguments selective and unconvincing.?

    This is what brought forth the discussion above.

    Review (enhanced) from:

    Facebook - PureBible
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/purebible/permalink/1603903833034833/
    ...
  22. salient arguments that authenticity defenders do not address

    A summary - the context was comments on:

    David W. Daniel's book:
    Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' a Fake?

    where to read and purchase Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' a Fake?...
  23. SART team references - Steven Avery and Mark Michie

    Some contras put together every reference to Steven Avery.
    Thanks! (I may cross-reference a bit with the page numbers in the hard copy.)

    =============================

    Little things, like:...
  24. Zosimas

    Zosimas
  25. monks write a "critical opinion of the abiliities of Tischendorf"

    This would go well with the discussion of Tischendorf's bumbling Greek

    From Stanley Porter, p. 51

    Constantine Tischendorf: The Life and Work of a 19th Century Bible Hunter (2014)
    Stanley E....
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4