Steven Avery
Administrator
We can skip Porson,
Looking at Adam Clarke from Michael George.
"A. Clarke, The New Testament: A Commentary and Critical Notes, Vol. 6 "
"Codex Montfortianus, a 13th Century Greek Manuscript; the alleged “Erasmus Promise” is dated between 1206-1272). "
"between Clarke and Forster, I am convinced God preserved this ONE Greek text to poke a finger in the scholars eyes Fresh off the press is a bunch of nonsense. Erasmus would never have included it if not for evidence."
The Codex Montfortianus [of the Greek New Testament]: a collation, throughout the Gospels and Acts, with the Greek text of Wetstein, and with certain MSS. in the University of Oxford
Orlando Thomas Dobbin (1807-1890)
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA5
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA14
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA15
British and Foreign Evangelical Review (1855)
Review
http://books.google.com/books?id=_Q4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA234
============================
New Plea (1867)
Chapter XI - Codex Montfortianus
Charles Forster
https://books.google.com/books?id=yXIsAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA118
p. 118-140
He discusses Michaelis-Marsh and Porson, not Dobbin.
Appeals to Clarke, Ussher, review of Mill and the palaeography of Montfaucon.
Discusses Latinizing idea of Wetstein.
He dismisses Britannicus and Montfortianus being the same. p. 126
============================
Also Grantley McDonald in
Raising the Ghost of Arius
Dobbin section starts on p. 278-284 although a lot of that is about his contra-mythicist article.
Grantley does not mention Forster in this context.
============================
Looking at Adam Clarke from Michael George.
"A. Clarke, The New Testament: A Commentary and Critical Notes, Vol. 6 "
"Codex Montfortianus, a 13th Century Greek Manuscript; the alleged “Erasmus Promise” is dated between 1206-1272). "
"between Clarke and Forster, I am convinced God preserved this ONE Greek text to poke a finger in the scholars eyes Fresh off the press is a bunch of nonsense. Erasmus would never have included it if not for evidence."
The Codex Montfortianus [of the Greek New Testament]: a collation, throughout the Gospels and Acts, with the Greek text of Wetstein, and with certain MSS. in the University of Oxford
Orlando Thomas Dobbin (1807-1890)
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA5
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA14
http://books.google.com/books?id=650HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA15
British and Foreign Evangelical Review (1855)
Review
http://books.google.com/books?id=_Q4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA234
============================
New Plea (1867)
Chapter XI - Codex Montfortianus
Charles Forster
https://books.google.com/books?id=yXIsAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA118
p. 118-140
He discusses Michaelis-Marsh and Porson, not Dobbin.
Appeals to Clarke, Ussher, review of Mill and the palaeography of Montfaucon.
Discusses Latinizing idea of Wetstein.
He dismisses Britannicus and Montfortianus being the same. p. 126
============================
Also Grantley McDonald in
Raising the Ghost of Arius
Dobbin section starts on p. 278-284 although a lot of that is about his contra-mythicist article.
Grantley does not mention Forster in this context.
============================
Last edited: