PDA

View Full Version : traditional ending of Mark



  1. the sinking pericope theories of James Snapp that are contra Markan ending authenticity
  2. external evidences - approaches of Snapp, Hester, Lunn reviewed and compared
  3. early church writers - references, usages and allusions - Ante-Nicene
  4. 99.9% of the Greek, Latin and Syriac mss support the traditional ending
  5. Snapp, Lunn and Hester are trojan horse authenticity positions - Burgon, Robinson, Hills and others are fine
  6. short summary of the massive extenal evidences for the traditional ending.
  7. the history of the modernist and contra authenticity positions - fighting the pure Reformation Bible
  8. ending of Mark usage - Euesbius to Jerome and dozens of post Nicea church writers
  9. the sinking pericope theories of James Snapp that are contra Markan ending authenticity
  10. James Snapp and Nazaroo on the Sinaiticus blank space
  11. the sinking pericope theories of James Snapp that are contra traditional Markan ending authenticity
  12. from Erasmus to Burgon - how the textual apostasy developed
  13. early references from the Nicholas P. Lunn book discussed - Epistle of Clement,, Shepherd of Hermas, Barnabas