View Full Version : traditional ending of Mark

  1. external evidences - approaches of Snapp, Hester, Lunn reviewed and compared
  2. early church writers - references, usages and allusions - Ante-Nicene
  3. 99.9% of the Greek, Latin and Syriac mss support the traditional ending
  4. Snapp, Lunn and Hester are trojan horse authenticity positions - Burgon, Robinson, Hills and others are fine
  5. short summary of the massive extenal evidences for the traditional ending.
  6. the history of the modernist and contra authenticity positions - fighting the pure Reformation Bible
  7. ending of Mark usage - Euesbius to Jerome and dozens of post Nicea church writers